Wednesday, August 18, 2010

Resources

Let me address a topic I do not believe I have ever touched upon but that I do like to follow, and that is resources, as in the stuff we use. This includes fuels, metals, precious gems and pretty much anything you can dig up, pump up or shovel up. China has over the past decade been on a rampage buying all this stuff up. Indeed they have at least at the moment cornered the market on rare Earth metals (which are not so rare but difficult to process - and it takes many years to build the infrastructure to process them). We cannot compete with China but there are some investments we can still capitalize upon. Let me give a few options for you to chew upon:

  • renewable energy is all the rage but most, if not all, cannot presently economically compete with oil. This will eventually change and the range of estimates on oil supplies is all across the board. Yet investing in some alternative energy areas can make money in the long term. Research it and pick your own entry point. I personally believe algae has the most promise. Yet there still needs to be a lot of research to make it work.
  • Biofuels are another topic related to the last. A lot of issues were created when we tried to use crop land needed for food to make fuels. Food needs will win out in time so it is better to focus on biofuels that can be made without using crop acreage, crop water or crop fertilizer. By the way, algae meets these requirements
  • Crops, by the way, are a very very important resource. Right now they are mostly grown with a host of fertilizers and water that is needed for other purposes. Thus, this week's multi-billion dollar bid for Potash. But there is so far you can go with fertilizer and water. Both are limited resources. In time we need to grow crops and feed an increasing population without them. And that will be difficult.

Disclosure: I have a few thousand, much less than I initially invested, in Valcent Technologies. It was in the algae field but has not done anything there for a while. It is more into hydroponic crops in vertical systems that use less water, fertilizer and the like. The crops can also be grown in urban areas, saving fuel. I have money in them because I believe in the idea but it could clearly be decades before it becomes popular.

Tuesday, August 17, 2010

Nationalize Mortgage Lending

Bill Gross, you know the big PIMCO guy, came out at a government sponsored idea-fest and recommended a novel idea - "full-nationalization" of the mortgage finance system. Now I agree with Bill much more than I disagree and I like to think that the feeling is mutual (or that he has ever read anything I have written), but on this one I am a bit mystified.

http://noir.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601010&sid=aQrLLpgud3rI

I am mystified because I thought our mortgage finance system was already pretty much nationalized. Seriously, there is no securitization market outside of Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac and banks simply are not lending unless they can pass the risk on to the Fannie or Freddie or they have insurance against loss from FHA. Fannie, Freddie and FHA represent 90-95% of all mortgages now being given and these entities are all government based mortgage finance. This will change in time but right now it appears that Gross has what he wants. Now he may want these government institutions to lower lending standards to support more mortgage lending, but that ain't happening, and it should not. Housing, whether the government supports lending or not, is going to take a few years to rebound. It is over-built, inventory is soon to go back to over a year, foreclosures are near all time highs, unemployment is a problem, underwater homes prevent people from selling and moving up (or down) and lending standards are much tighter than they used to be (including very conservative - newly so - folks doing appraisals). A housing recovery is not, and should not be, in the cards.

And let me add one more factor I have NOT read about; I do not think most people (other than investors) want to buy a house. Now I know housing prices have fallen drastically, interest rates are at record lows and it is in many respects an ideal time to buy. But there are some respected folks predicting a further decline in prices, foreclosures are at very high levels, folks see nightmares (not American dreams) among those that bought before and lending standards are much more conservative. For buyers on the edge who see what has happened financially to a large percentage of the population who are underwater, I have to think they are saying to themselves they are better off to rent. This seems to be proven in part by low home sales, I might add. Sure there are plenty of reasons to dispute this and say it is a good time to buy, but I am not about to argue with them. After all, rental rates are low too and with housing prices down they will need to continue to drop to compete. We will see.

Industrial Production Up

So the markets in the U.S. and, as I write, in Asia are up on unexpectedly high U.S. production numbers, not to mention decent results by WalMart and Home Depot. Add in a little bump by a purchase bid for Potash (I thought about buying some months ago, darn it) and you get a good bounce. Now I admit I would not expect a U.S. production bounce, not with poor economics, low consumer spending, the EU in doldrums, unemployment and inventory corrections largely done, but hey, what do I know. I do know that fundamentals, while gradually improving or at least stabilizing, have a couple of years to get there. Maybe a melt-down is not in the cards (though I predict a pretty big down-turn this fall absent major stimulus delaying same), yet even with no down-turn I do not see any real support for a major bounce or sustained rally from here either. Friday, with options expiring, should be interesting.

Disclosures: None.

Monday, August 16, 2010

Across the Pond

I raise the EU as things have been a bit silent on the EU front for a while. Seriously, they do a few hundred billion in emergency funds, tie it to some extreme austerity measures, hide the EU bank stress tests from any implication of sovereign debt issues and then cross their fingers and pray people ignore them for a very very long time. Because if people pay attention then they will notice things the EU does not want them to notice.

They will start seeing that austerity is extremely painful - on private and governmental basis. Extreme austerity, which is being required in Greece and certain other EU countries, can quite easily lead to significant GDP reductions. Don't believe me, ask Ireland, which has been seeing negative GDP due to its extreme austerity. The good news is that if you survive you will come out of the tunnel and be ahead of the game. In that respect it may make some sense, like Ireland, to dive in the pool early and get it behind you. The bad news is that if too many countries dive into the pool at the same time, especially a lot of politically and economically connected countries, then all boats take on water at the same time and no one is around to through the life ring. And so we wait and we will see.

Then again there are a number of countries, like Hungary, who said no. Yes, they said no. No to austerity and the authorities can take their emergency measures and shove them. We will see.

Now some of these problems have been building for a very long time. EU has certain sovereign debt versus GDP ratios that are required for memebership. As it turns out, various EU countries, with the assistance of certain financial institutions, have been hiding their financial issues for many years. And yet, right now, things seem a bit quite there. I suspect there are some major rumblings behind those closed doors.

http://www.nakedcapitalism.com/2010/08/satyajit-das-grecian-derivative.html

I have no new negative news on the EU to pass on just at the moment, but wait, it will come. Here is a piece on the EU bank stress tests not really doing much and how things might just do a little more poorly there than the tests suggests:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/sovereign-debt-part-5d-european-banks.html

And here on this side of the pond, at least one well respected expert expects housing inventory to shoot up, perhaps to a year of inventory. Boy, that is going to suck.


http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/one-year-supply-of-houses-and-other.html

Sunday, August 15, 2010

Negative

I am just passing on a post I just read from Calculated Risk noting some negative news expected out. Before going there, this blog also has a nice, unofficial, problem bank list. While the FDIC has only taken down a couple of banks the past couple of weeks - well off their YTD average - that does not mean things are improving as the problem bank list ain't shrinkin'! Okay, that last sentence had just a tad of flashback to my wife's reunion recently in WV. It was a three day reunion and included one night with both of us and our two kids in the ER (though everything turned out fine.) But I digress. Back to the post of the negative news, which is mostly focused on real estate. As the link notes, expect some bad number in that category in the weeks and months to come. Also, expect a major downward revision to the second quarter GDP estimates. I have seen another article calculating that the GDP - originally estimated at 2.4% - will be reduced to 1.2% due in large part to the new trade deficit numbers out this week. Undoubtedly, when it is officially announced the market will react, but the numbers are already in so the result is expected.


http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/negative-news-flow.html

I may post a bit more later.

Disclosures: None

Wednesday, August 11, 2010

My Own Two Cents

I typically try to pass on to readers the best - in my opinion - of what I am reading to share the information. But after reading a lot sometimes the temptation is too much not to share my own view, for the two cents it is worth. I am not an economist and do not have any formal education in economics or finance and so this post is certainly not to be viewed as anything other than the views of another by-stander, though I hope from one who has followed the economy more closely than most other by-standers. So here I go:

I have read a lot of very convincing posts and articles on the need for austerity here in the U.S. to reduce government debt and the need for massive additional government spending to stimulate us back to growth. I have read equally convincing articles and blogs on deflation on the horizon and inflation, indeed hyper-inflation, on the horizon. I spend hours daily reading this stuff and find myself more confused than ever. One thing I do know is that fundamentals, economically, are messed up here in the U.S., in the EU, increasingly in China and - by default - in many other countries. The economy is global now and while some countries are not suffering like the EU and U.S., they nonetheless are not immune to what is happening. After looking at where all these countries stand, you certainly realize there is a very mixed bag of problems. So what do we do now?

I hear the arguments of those supporting massive stimulus. To them I must say we have already done that and, frankly, it did not work. It may have briefly brought us out of the recession and it may have helped to significantly stabilize a very volatile situation in our economy, but at the end of the day stimulus will not cure massive personal debt, housing problems more pervasive than we have ever seen and unemployment that simply will not go away. Stimulus, beyond stabilizing an economy on the edge of the abyss simply is not doing anything in this situation. Don't get me wrong, there may still be a need for stimulus here and there, but it is a bandaid, not a cure.

The other side of the coin is austerity. I am convinced from what I have read that the U.S. has spent massively but not to the point where it is a material problem. In other words, the extreme austerity measures being enacted in Greece and many other EU countries is not wise for the U.S.. Ireland is a prime example of how extreme austerity can lead to extreme recession. Our current debt levels in the U.S. are not a significant isssue at the moment, though they need to be addressed before our country's demographics push a host of folks onto Social Security and Medicare. In any event, government debt does not need to be the top priority at the moment, though it does need to be considered and dealt with in time. Again, I am not saying austerity in certain EU countries was not needed. Sovereign debt was becoming radioactive in certain countries so extreme measures were probably needed to renew confidence and keep banks supporting sovereign debt. Yet, the austerity will lead to significant recessions in the EU for years to come, which will certainly spill over to other countries, but perhaps this is the medicine they need.

The current course for the U.S. in my view is to have enough government stimulus or support to avert any melt downs but otherwise let nature take its course. We have years ahead, perhaps over a decade, where personal debt levels need to normalize, also called deleveraging. It is happening, but with unemployment, houses under water and the like, it will take a long time for folks to deleverage. We have a similar time period for housing prices to get normalized. Foreclosures are a significant issue for the next couple of years. Lenders are holding most REOs off the market, on a massive scale, and the market will take years to correct. The same goes for commercial real estate. I read a few months back that the U.S. has 50% more CRE than the second closest country. With 70% of our GDP from consumer spending, no wonder. Well, that consumer spending piggy bank (be it due to unemployment, housing prices down where folks have no money to take out of their homes or tight credit standards that are taking hold) is gone forever and CRE will face years of doldrums. The same issues hold true for retailers. Yep, 70% of the GDP is on hold for a long time to come. Years of debt reduction are needed to repair this situation.

The bottom line in my book is enough stimulus to keep the world from falling apart but not enough to build a new bubble or inspire more debt. Years are needed for us to correct to a sustainable level, probably over five and perhaps much more. It will be a boring half decade or decade financially speaking, the stock market will suck or be stagnate, housing prices will likely fall further, more businesses will fail or cut back, and we will not have a lot of fun, but we will survive and get back to a place where we can sustain our activity. This is my prescription for success. Not very exciting, is it?

Disclosures: None.

Tuesday, August 10, 2010

Tick, tick, tick . . .

In my opinion, our current situation is a time bomb ticking away. The Fed's -totally expected - announcement today on the minimal relief they will provide was simply an inept attempt to diffuse the bomb, and it did not work (it only muffled the ticking sound). Yet the clock continues to tick. Mind you, it is a clock of undetermined length and the explosion when it stops ticking will likely be more like one of those snake fireworks that you light and they burn and grow for a long time, but the clock will eventually get there. So why the snake analogy? Well, I do not see the market or the economy falling off a cliff when reality sits in. Folks will figure out that we are in for a long period of a stagnant economy and things will get to a sustained long downward direction. The direction will be down for a long sustained period and, while it will have a lot of violent bounces, will over time (a long time) trend downwards.

It may be like Japan but I suspect it will not last as long. Japan is working on over two decades of stagnation and no relief is in sight. The U.S. has problems but the U.S. bubbles were not that extreme. I remember at one point, at the height of the Japan real estate bubble, an article proclaimed that the many acres of, I believe it is called, the Royal Palace in Japan, was alone worth more than all the real estate in the U.S. Now I never saw any verification of this, but it is clear that RE in Japan set a new standard in insanity. Now Japan has set a new insanity in terms of the poster child of what can go wrong. And this, my friends, is what we have to fear.

The FOMC results today were totally expected. I think the Fed is out of any big bullets and reality is about to set in. The next 12 months will not be a happy time - and you can quote me on that or shove it in my face a year from now to tell me how wrong I am. I have been for some months predicting a problematic third and fourth quarter. More specifically I have been expecting a very trying September and October and have not changed my opinion. I thought briefly in June that the market had reacted negatively before I expected but a nice 10% or so bounce over the past month and a half have given me the expectation my timing was right.

Many months ago I noted some option mortgage issues peaking this fall and now you have many banks, Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac accelerating foreclosures on what happened earlier this year and last. REOs are shooting through the roof, employment sucks wind, saving rates are going up, companies are cutting back and, well, it is time to get out of the pool. Good luck if you decide to stay in for a while. I am on the side-lines and have been mostly for two and a half years. Being on the side-lines helped me miss the big drop and the big run-up since March of 2009. But I sleep at night. And I am still going to sleep well the rest of this year as I sit on the side-lines waiting to see if I am right or wrong. I rest much better knowing that the market has had an incredible run the past year and a half that was not at all based on fundamentals. So I ask myself, is there more upside potential or downside potential? Good question to ask yourself at the moment. And remember, while you are pondering that question, the clock continues to tick.

Update 8/11/10 at 9:35: Then again, given the market dive this morning, it looks like we may not make it to September.
Disclosures: None

Sunday, August 8, 2010

Unemployment blues!

I just got back from a long weekend visiting former neighbors. They live on a lake and have a boat. Proves that it is great to have friends in high places. We had a great time and their son, who turned 7 this weekend, had a great time with my kids. In any event, great time but little to no time for reading up on stuff and posting. Still, I have found a nugget or two in late night reading. Let's start with this interesting piece and a very interesting chart on unemployment. Pay particular attention to the percentage unemployed over 27 weeks, which would simply represent those still looking. I do not think this needs explanation.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/duration-of-unemployment.html

Commercial RE Numbers are down big time in June:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/costar-commercial-real-estate-prices.html

And consumer credit continues to decline:

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/consumer-credit-declines-in-june.html

But the good news is that only one more bank failed last week. Mind you that we went a couple fo back-to-back years this decades with no bank failures but only one last week - 109 this year to date - is not an improvement.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2010/08/bank-failure-109-ravenswood-bank.html

Unless you are asleep, all the links have been from Calculated Risk, one of my favorite sites and a good one to follow for weekly stats and good, I think unbiased, commentary on where things stand. In any event, the next few months will be very interesting.

P.S. Let me add one more tidbit today from Calculated Risk - Freddie Mac ROEs are up 79% - yes 79% - YOY. Lest you forget, last year was not a good year in terms of foreclosures and RE either. Fannie and Freddie, however, held off for a long time doing foreclosures in an apparent attempt to help families live the American Dream. Now they are ramping up the foreclosures big time, so forecasts - like that of Merridth Witney predicting another 10% drop in house prices this year - seem to have some basis.

[Okay, you will have to go to Calculated Risk to find the intended link as, apparently, I linked an article about early puberty in girls, which was not quite on point.

Disclosures: None.