Saturday, September 3, 2011

Macro-Macro - The Bad, The Ugly and, Perhaps, The Good

I obviously focus on macro-economic trends and ideas, but let's digress just a tad and focus on super-macro or macro-macro stuff. It is out there and you can find it, but it perhaps does not get enough attention. There is plenty I can say here but I will focus on a couple of areas and follow with more later.

Demographics

Let's start with demographics, i.e. that how old are your people thingy. Now let me add that demographics means a bit more than just how many old people you have and how old they are, but from an economic perspective, that is the demographic of concern.

There are certain countries that have very poor demographics, like Japan with a pretty aged population, those with poor demographics like the US and much of the EU, with a population increasingly in retirement age in the next 20-30 years, and those not too bad like India. China has bad demographics from an age perspective and dismal demographics from a gender balance perspective due to its one child policy.

I read last week that in the U.S. stock prices can be expected to go down overall for the next 15 years or so because of demographics. Simply speaking, PE ratios tend to go down as demographics/populations age so stock prices will go down simply because the population is aging. Now I question this a bit as stock prices in US markets are increasingly tied to other economies more than the US economies (i.e. US company profits are less domestically based), so the US demographics should over time have even less impact. Nonetheless, the fact that older populations correlate to lower PE ratios is not a stat worth ignoring.


Demographics is Nothin'

While we cannot ignore demographics, if you are focusing long term, i.e. 10-30 years, there are more important things happening. A lot of folks are betting on emerging economies. Money this past decade has been going into China, India and other emerging economies to the point where some may not even be considered emerging any more. So what happens when a few billion people start being consumers? What happens when they start buying homes, TVs, cars, different food, fuel, electricity, plumbing, clean water, etc. We in the US have been greedy bastards hording an overwhelming relative percentage of the world's resources. When the rest of the world wakes up - especially countries with populations of a billion or more - and start actively trying to bring a better life-style to their citizens, then the resources that might supply such life-styles become strained.

Let's face it, the world is incapable from a resource perspective to give everyone on Earth the life-style of the average American. We simply cannot do it. So while emerging economies strive to get to what we have, they simply make it even more impossible. We cannot all be gluttons. So, my friends, as you rush off to invest in emerging markets or you praise the life style gains in China, India and the like, keep in mind their growth helps seal every one's fate. Us gluttons need to fall back in our life styles to allow enough global resources to support their growth.

Many think we are already at peak oil. Absent some breakthrough in renewable energy, it is going to get a lot worse before it gets better.

China has been buying up precious metal supplies and has the current market cornered, which is causing a bit of an international dispute.

These and similar issues will continue to be regular headlines going forward, so get used to it.

Agriculture

To me, however, the biggest issue for the next 20-50 years will be food. The global population is still growing and we are still actively finding ways to keep people alive and for longer. While this all sounds great if you are one who was saved by medical miracles or who is living longer due to basic advances, it is not really a good thing overall just yet. Unless we can feed all these people, having more is a big problem. And from what I have seen some of the environmental changes are making sustainability - from a food source perspective - quite questionable. There are dozens of factors here from bad farming techniques - overuse of fertilizers, herbicides, insecticides, and the like - weather patterns, and short term goals for corporate farms. Overall, we have some very dangerous dynamics developing in terms of feeding the world and these are already leading to massive riots in various countries where families are literally paying over 50% of their incomes to put food on the table. This will get much worse before it gets better.

The bright side is that those looking for a job in the US may have a bright future in agriculture should they be wise enough to consider it. My maternal grandparents were farmers and it seemed family farms were a thing of the past by the time I grew up. Now I think properly run family farms that farm wisely are perhaps one of the best future industries in the US. We have the resources and if we use them wisely we can do quite well feeding a lot of the world. Unfortunately, too few are thinking this way. It is, however, a thought I hope to plant with my kids.

Disclosures: None.

Friday, September 2, 2011

No Job Creation - As in None, Nada, Zip, Forget About It!!

A bit ironic that going into Labor Day weekend we have zero growth in non-farm payrolls for the first time since 1945 (though you have to acknowledge that there was a bit of a major strike in the cards here distorting the figures).

http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/44370462/ns/business/

And the numbers for job growth the past two months were decreased somewhat significantly.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2011/09/august-employment-report-0-jobs.html

This is shocking - not that it happened, just that it is shocking that many did not expect it. I have done this drill a lot, but let's repeat. Government stimulus is gone and dead and, like it or not, the Tea Party is forcing us into a deficit reduction mode whether this makes present sense or not. Deficit reduction reduces GDP - it does not increase it. And while I agree it is necessary, I recognize a genuine debate on whether right now is the time. Like it or not, I think it is happening.

QE2 also dead, and no QE3 yet announced, though I still expect it to happen. EU on the ropes (a bit more below), States cutting back, China cutting back and a bunch of other cut-backs around the globe. While I agree most U.S. companies are sitting on a lot of capital and are not going belly up, they are also not hiring as they do not know where their sales growth is coming from enough to support hiring. And I do not either.

And so we get to Europe. Oh my dear Europe. I personally do not see any realistic global recovery until the EU gets past its problems and I do not see that happening any time soon. Greek bonds, again moving sharply higher and what else would anyone expect. Just a matter of time before the EU takes its medicine and we may (as in undoubtedly will) get a foul taste from the same medicine in the U.S.

http://www.calculatedriskblog.com/2011/09/europe-update-greek-bond-yields-move.html

Now the rumors were in the market on this today and now it is news. The Federal Housing Finance Agency (FHFA) has sued 17 financial institutions over losses to Fannie and Freddie, including some officers and other individuals. Now I am sure you may have heard of a few of the institutions, such as Bank of America, Citigroup, Goldman Sachs, JP Morgan Chase, HSBC and the like. If you need it, here is the news release giving details:

http://www.fhfa.gov/webfiles/22599/PLSLitigation_final_090211.pdf

One might say that this is not a good time for this suit. I do not have the details but last I heard Fannie and Freddie (as in us taxpayers) were out about $200B on the situation, but still, many might say with the economy suffering this is the wrong time for this suit. I, on the other hand, think it is long over due. We built major moral hazard saving these institutions over the past three years and putting them to task for what they did is well over due. It may delay a recovery, but well worth the pain for the gain of damping down moral hazard of them continuing their reckless ways. Sure, they have gotten their act together on not lending to those with no credit but me thinks they are still playing fast and loose with the derivatives game and I am all for them paying the price on this. Lest you missed it the Madoff Trustee filed an $19B suit against JP Morgan Chase seeking to hold it liable for the losses to the Madoff Ponzi scheme. No comment on who wins, but moral hazard is something we need to cure before we can move forward.

Disclosures: None. Though I do personally bank with a subsidiary of RBS, which is one of the aforementioned defendants.




Tuesday, August 30, 2011

Read This

No time to post as I am on an office off-site but please read this, it is by someone who really knows what is going on. Hunker down, my friend, hunker down

http://seekingalpha.com/article/290445-the-end-of-the-world-part-i

Monday, August 29, 2011

A ONE BILLION DOLLAR PRIZE!!

I apologize to my usual audience, but I am simply doing a test to see what type of headline might get noticed. Simply research here so please go on about your usual way.

Blow the Party Horns!!

Yes, consumer spending "rallied" in July!! You heard it right - it rallied by .8%!! Now if you exclude the inflationary fuel and food spending, it was just up .2% - the same as June - but baby this sucker rallied!! But wait, spending increases exceeded income increases. So what does that mean? Does it mean a highly leveraged consumer went heavier into debt, largely to buy necessities like food and gas? Does it mean, after adjustments for inflation, disposable income actually fell? Does it mean you need to know what you are reading before popping the corks?

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/business/economy/us-consumer-spending-rallied-in-july.html?google_editors_picks=true

Yes, this consumer spending increase and the news that two Greek banks are merging (two negatives apparently do make a positive) have sent the market on a tear.

http://www.nytimes.com/2011/08/30/business/daily-stock-market-activity.html?google_editors_picks=true

God forbid the market actually had something truly positive to digest.

Disclosure: Unbelievable.

INCREDIBLE!!

The market is up today, continuing Friday's rise, on very low volume. This is just fantastic. I admit I did not see this coming. I mean, who could ever expect the wonderful financial news of the past few days that has inspired investors to buy in? I did not see it coming and, well, still do not see it here. Seriously, I see no significant financial or economic news to justify any market increase. If you have a clue on what is driving this then please help me out here as I have not seen any news to spur buying or negate selling. Just asking . . .

Yours, Clueless

Disclosures: None.